more obvious things i have pointed out

tuckovaLeave a comment

Who should set their alarms for 6 a.m.: People who intend to get up at 6 a.m.

Who should not set their alarms for 6 a.m.: People who sleep next to insomniacs who are low on sleep to begin with; people who are able to merge the annoying howl of their alarm clocks with a dream about pretty birds for a solid minute; people who are not getting, and have not ever gotten out of bed before 7.
Bonus: people who can’t remember how to turn off the alarm without turning on a light and looking at it even though the clock is some 5 years old. I am looking at you, and this is why you are not allowed to play with my shiny new camera.

Diner of Abandonment

tuckova2 Comments

When I was little, I used to report on the quality of every public restroom I ever used. Cleanliness, size, and any special features (black soap!) were relayed in what I assume was the piping high voice of an only child, the voice that is sure it is conveying information of greatest interest to those gathered around food that has magically become less appetizing. My lucky family.

Eventually, I was given to understand that these bathroom reports were not as interesting to others as they were to me. Coincidentally around that time I started having a fear, and this is before those annoying Culkin movies, that I would be left in a bathroom someday. That I would walk out of the bathroom to find that everyone had gone on to prettier places and there I’d be, alone.

As I got older, and started increasingly thinking like an anthropologist, featuring the idea that all behavior has a cause, the fear took on new layers. Either everybody was thinking about me as much as I was thinking about them, and there would be a combined unanimous decision to leave that annoying girl behind, quick let’s sneak out while she’s in there, or there would be a combined inability to think about me at all, and people would just inadvertently wander off, no head count to ascertain that one of us had been left behind, and what do you mean by "one of us": who are you?

As a result, I have probably the fastest bladder in the world, and even though I wash my hands every time, I can be back from the bathroom before anybody has a chance to ask for the check or even start a new topic of conversation, a skill Sam Diamond would envy, but advantages born from fear are always tinged a bit with their ugly origins.

I was well into my thirties before I confessed to this fear. It was one of my more difficult confessions, and to be honest my throat gets a little tight even typing about it, because I do get what it says about me, and I understand that while my brain would greatly entertain a psychoanalyst, it is not always a whole lot of fun to live with.

And to my point: Imagine my delight and surprise last week, walking out of the bathroom of the diner where we had breakfast, to discover that while my purse and cards remained at the table, my entire family had vamoosed. Like a dream coming true! Nifty! Fortunately they hadn’t gone farther than the parking lot, so I rejoined them without incident (and my wallet was still in my purse, yay).

I don’t know what it means, whether I should take from this that things I dread will happen but not really matter that much, or that there is no way to reasonably to prevent what I know will happen, or what. I do know that I had recently talked to certain wise people about this very fear, and that means I had somebody with whom to share the punchline, and I think maybe that’s the important part: not that your fears come true, but that you have somebody to laugh with you after.

Photos of the Diner of Abandonment and the rest of the trip are up on flickr.

i’m in yr time zone, soakin in yr culture

tuckova4 Comments

I’m in New York hanging with my friend G while Squire Tuck is off doing some grandparent/child bonding thing upstate. I assume our young Squire is having a good time, but I suspect I’m having a better time. During the day, G’s in school and I work on his adorable little laptop (how DO people work on laptops? I feel like I’m used to being the captain of a starship with my giant desk and my wave keyboard and suddenly I’m like trapped in some bitty shuttle craft), which is not a blast, BUT in the evening we whirlwindily do New York Stuff. We walked through Central Park, we went to the Met and looked at marble dudes, we watched a sunset off a pier, we saw Xanadu!, we had very schmancy drinks in an unmarked bar, I smoked a cigarette on a stoop, and I’m not telling you the half of it. I got Squire a t-shirt from the Natural History Museum. I think we’ll keep the fact that I went to the circus just between ourselves, though, okay, or he’ll never let me out of his sight again. I have FUN when I travel, I’m saying.

We were in Washington D.C. for a few days, hanging with family and making sure my tear ducts are fully functional. They are! In addition to Standard Familial Strife, things that made me cry were: watching Barbara Morgan on the live feed, Mr. Rogers’ red sweater, seeing the ghost dance dresses, that giant Calder mobile, and the fact that the Smithsonian is free. Best and worst of America, all right there. I wanted to kiss a flag and burn it at the same time, and even that conflict made me feel more American than I have in a long time, and more at peace with it.

The day before I left I found out somebody had been copying my writing here and passing them off as her own. This caused me quite a bit of –I don’t want to say I was angry, but I certainly was confused. Why would you want to pretend to be someone else, have someone else’s life, in an online journal? It is ever so strange. And it stirred up some stuff for me, like Why Do I Write and What Is This Thing Called Blog and so on. But then I had a plane to catch so I couldn’t really work it out.

Anyway, that’s how we roll. Hope you’re having fun where you are, too.

what I read

tuckova1 Comment

I finished "The Golden Compass" over the weekend. I had started reading it to Squire Tuck and then apparently wasn’t reading it fast enough, because he started reading it alone. Since I hadn’t already read it, I hopped to so we could talk about it.

I liked it a lot. It takes a certain amount of thinking for granted, which I particularly like in a children/YA book. It was well-written, and there was a decent flow to the plot. I liked that the end of a chapter was really the end of a chapter, and not always a cliffhanger. I liked how things progressed in a way that was exciting and possible to follow.

I also thought Pullman did a good job of telling you things about characters in a way that revealed his thoughts about them. For example, there’s a part when he says that Lyra has no imagination. This is hard to fathom because she’s a great on-the-spot liar, which to me requires an active imagination, but Pullman explains that in fact she is a good liar because she believes what she says… in a way, he presents something and explains it away at the same time. I wasn’t sure I agreed with him but it’s clear he thought about what he wrote.

He has a way of describing people through their behavior that I thought was really powerful. Mrs. Coulter only has a few complete scenes in the book, and each scene revealed more about her than a page of adjectives. I wish that he had spent less time using the adjectives later, because it felt a little screenplay to me, a little "stay with my visuals!" but he did so well describing action to reveal character that if he wants to be sure you see HIS character, that’s fair.

On the downside: He doesn’t always describe how people interact and how they got to feel the way they do about each other very well. Some relationships are clear in a sentence or two ("Ma Costa had clouted Lyra dizzy on two occasions but fed her hot gingerbread on three") but many of them fell short, for me. Lyra explains that she loves Iorek because he was kicked out of a country for murder, as was her father, except that no loving relationship ever seems clear between her and her father. Her quick affection for Iorek seems reasonably placed but the reasons given don’t line up. I had problems with her relationship with Lord Asriel, too, who spends quite a few pages threatening to kill her in the beginning, but is described later as always treating her as "an adult engaging a child in a pretty trick." Wha–? Her parents’ relationship was particularly difficult for me to understand: so passionate and so dead at the same time. Maybe I’ve never had relationships like these, so it doesn’t make sense to me, but I think the problem is that Pullman doesn’t really know how to describe these relationships himself. A relationship that should be key, Lyra’s parents are fierce and infinitely sad and passionate and dizzy and they don’t make sense, and it hurts the book that they don’t.

And… the alethiometer seemed a little too handy. It was not as handy as "because Dumbledore thinks so" (glargh!) but it really did seem almost too much. As if the book got written and then there were holes in the plot that had to be mended, and boom! they were. This is a minor complaint, though. It’s just — he did so well at describing other otherworldly things to a degree that made them seem really possible that I’m sorry he didn’t spend more time making the alethiometer seem as real, at least not to me. I finished and wanted to think for days about what form my daemon would take, but I never once considered what I would ask the alethiometer, if I could. Do you see what I mean?

Anyway. Good book, glad I read it, want to read the rest. Next up will be some non-fiction, I think. By the way, when people tell you Nora Ephron’s latest book ("I Feel Bad About My Neck") is "funny" what they mean is that they have never read a decent blog post, because there are at least 20 writers out there who make my ribs hurt, but Nora Ephron never even made me smile.

do be do be dubious

tuckovaLeave a comment

you are a forest of wonder but when somebody wanders through, you feel
hurt if they fail to see every single tree. you who have never bothered
to name things scream beech pine fir needles stump! and they say it is
nice to be in the forest, with the dappled light and the quiet, it is
so peaceful, and your fingers jab at their stupid ears that have missed
specific birdsong.

you make dinner and when they eat it they are thinking of your
fingers in their mouths, nurture and exploration, and your head
explodes because excuse me i have to do the dishes too. you would like
to be evaluated for who you are but you get upset if someone fails to notice what you do.

you are made of your actions, each action a playing card
carefully balanced to build a house that is structurally sound and
visually pleasing, and with your sense of humor you’ve balanced the
jack of hearts against the seven of cups but not everyone is such a
connoisseur. another word for connoisseur is snob. you alert them to your
pinch of cinnamon and they say mmm and you’re angry for the cinnamon
not being acknowledged, and they’re confounded because what do you
want, are they not eating, contentedly rubbing their bellies, catlike
stretched to bask in the wonder of being full of things you made that
they can’t be bothered to name. another word for can’t be bothered is lazy.

it is hard to understand that people can be happy without being
able to name their happiness but then you cried for three straight
hours and couldn’t say why so don’t get too high on the horse is all
i’m saying. it’s quite a fall from a horse. more than a tumble in the
hay. it is hard to not be pissed at the blind person who doesn’t see
what a good colorer you are. it is hard to remember that you decided to
color inside the lines because it pleases you; it is hard to remember
that they are your lines. there are people who draw freehand.

i
don’t mean you’re wrong. for the love of all things sweet don’t start
crying again. i mean that you don’t look at a picasso and say nice use
of blue. well, you might say
that. other people are saying words like form, fluid movement, abyss of
pain. naturally ideally one could say all those things. i mean: there
are things that are wrong and there are things that cannot be fixed and
you would do well to keep your forest lovely because it’s in your
nature, to balance the cards because it feels like success, to color
within the lines because it pleases you, and to maybe stop talking
about art and just look at it. you can spend enough energy keeping
control over the things you actually can, make your charts and lists
and rationales, stock up on tissues, live through this. but not if you
try to blame it on other people.

what i’m reading

tuckova1 Comment

I’m still reading Love in the Time of Cholera. I was going to finish it before I went to Greece but then I took on this textbook editing project (editing by hand! Totally quaint! Fortunately I remember most of the proofreader’s marks so it’s okay… but it does interfere with my pleasure reading).

Anyway. I thought I didn’t like Marquez because I really didn’t much like 100 Years of Solitude; I’ve never really been able to get behind magic realism. I love long meandering stories, I like a touch of the absurd, I like the idea that reality is in fact pretty flexible, but magic realism is the potato salad of literature: I love all the ingredients, I hate the result. Other than a weak spot for Tom Robbins, which he’s doing his level best to eliminate, I really have never gotten the point of magic realism.

So I never bothered to read any more of Marquez’s work, because, you know, why. You don’t keep picking up Raymond Chandler if you don’t like hardboiled detective stories. But then here I am with  …Cholera and I’m reading it and I’m enjoying it and yet there is something in it that nags at me and I tried to explain this over beer last night and I thought I’d try again over coffee.

I really don’t do well with adjectives deployed to describe characters. I need to be given actions and allowed to locate my own adjectives. And I’ve noticed this with Kundera, too, and it’s why I have trouble with him, and why I have trouble with Klima, and why so many books that are otherwise delightful to me wind up flung across the room as if they were Hemingway clones (really, really hate Hemingway clones. Not a big fan of Hemingway either, but glah, the clones). I do not want to hear "she was a fierce woman" or "he was a man of firm principles" — I want to know how she’s fierce, what principles are firm. I think that this is why, ultimately, I find Kundera’s characters (and am now finding the ones in Cholera) to be so unbelievable: because it seems these adjectives mean something different to me than they do to the authors, and so then the actions that are shown make no sense. I have noticed this problem with my friends, too, that the ones who tell me stories of "he did this and this" are the ones I can listen to for hours, but the ones who tell me "he is cruel" are the phone calls I have trouble returning.

I also have, and I realize this is a personal thing, trouble liking characters who leave their children. I will never, ever like Anna Karenina, although I’ve given it almost as many attempts as I have Lolita (another book I can never like, I finally realized after several miserable rides through Nabokov’s hideous sea. I concede that the man can write words, sentences, paragraphs, but I can’t stay in a boat with someone who hates his main character) and my conclusion is the same: I don’t like Anna and I can’t like that book. And I can’t like Fermina now and I don’t know if that’s going to ruin the book for me, but between the adjectives, which are on a steady rise here at page 270, and the fact that things appear to be boarding a hot air balloon of unreality without showing any signs of actually cutting the ropes and soaring away… well, I don’t know. You don’t get a lot of first sentences better than "The scent of bitter almonds always reminded him of the fate of unrequited love," and it’s not as if I’m not going to finish or that I’m going to hurl the book from me or anything but I’m a little frustrated.

And I wanted to talk about something other than my shameful craving for Ronald McDonald and the Deathly Hallows. 

Persephone

tuckovaLeave a comment

Anemone, you told me, and then
hyacinth, orchid, peony;
like any parent you wanted me to know the names
of things; to be informed.
"Flowers!" I answered, bored.
I was more interested in
the holes left by my ruthless bouquets.
Already I was not meant for your world.

We can blame the man, because it’s easy.
Who doesn’t blame men, wanting more than they deserve:
wanting something bright against their endless darkness
a pretty girl with a wilted bunch of flowers;
wanting for a moment to put out his hand
and touch something that didn’t belong to him.

But I also took what didn’t belong to me.
I wasn’t hungry and I wasn’t really curious and
I wasn’t even exactly bored.
I tasted the bitter red juice and
I was fiercely happy.
I still am.

Mother! to the extent I am responsible
for your unhappiness, I am sorry.
But you would not have wanted me in your world
always
you would not have wanted me to stay with you
anyway.

I had fun.

tuckova1 Comment

things I know more about now than I did two weeks ago:

greek almond milkshakes, greek arugula, greek assumptions, greek
balconies, greek boat rides, greek bus rides, greek chinese massages, greek
coffee, greek dances, greek delight, greek dolmades, greek earplugs, greek feta,
greek frolicking and cavorting, greek karaoke hell, greek long island ice teas,
greek monastery, greek naps, greek octopus, greek ouzo, greek passport control,
greek pizza, greek roadside memorials, greek ruins, greek sand, greek second, greek
shade of blue, greek slurpees with alcohol, greek stuffed peppers, greek
sunburn, greek swallows’ nests, greek swimming, greek volcano, greek water, greek
waves, greek wind, greek wine, greek women (old), greek yogurt, greeks singing
se agapo…