cup your hands

This cup with its damage. Knocked down, swept off the table; it was
probably an accident. I don’t remember the noise it made when it fell, when it
shattered, though I know how it sounded because I hear it in the silence when I
can’t sleep. The frowny mouth open in its "oh no" shock and the cup falls,
bounces, and then kkkksssssh.
 
The only cup I had, the only vessel, coffee and tea and juice oh my love.
Damaged and irreplaceable. I set the pieces out and numbered,
accounted. Step one, step two, and glue and glue. Pieces of the handle never to
be seen again but I glued what I could and held it together. The glue dried. It
held water. I wrap my hands around it now and it feels like more of a gift for
having nearly lost it, hold it tight, precious.
 
You who want to talk about how it broke and when; you who want to talk
about why I used the glue I did; you who wonder why I didn’t throw it out; you
who think I could learn pottery and make a new cup; you who, yoo-hoo. You call me
and I can hear you but I am disinclined to listen, with my hands around my cup,
its lacework of cracks are a map of my history now, and the steam rises from the
tea in a beautiful cloud through which I imagine I can see the future.

one problem

One problem with thinking about doing something is that even if later
you decide that you’re not going to do it, even if later you decide it
would be a bad thing or even a Very Bad thing, even if you’re totally
convinced that you ought not do that thing, the problem is: you already
thought about it. You put it on the table at some point and there it is
on the table forever and always and even if some part of your brain
knows it’s total poison that part of your brain has to constantly be
informing your hands that just because it’s on the table doesn’t make
it potato chips and you cannot either eat just one so just don’t even
start. Don’t even. But you put it on the table once. But it’s still a
really bad idea. No, really it is.

mostly true

I was nice to him because he was with you, liked him because you liked him. When you broke up I lost you both.
***
While you were feeding quarters to the jukebox so you could dance with
her like you used to, she asked if she could sleep at my place, just
for a week or so.
***
Watching him wave and make monkey faces as the train pulled away, and
then listening for two hours about how handsome he was, how much you
loved him. Eating a sandwich and listening, listening, listening.
***
When you went to get the drinks, he said I was a witch for what I did to him. He said when he touched your hair he pretended it was mine.
***
I was talking about how much I hate your wife, the things you say she does to you. When I looked up your daughter was sitting across from me.
***
When you left the room. The things I heard. The things I learned. I am tired of being another woman.

listening to Regina Spector

hey remember that time when I left flowers on his doorstep
hey remember that time when I skipped over every crack
hey remember that time when I only slept 3 hours a day
hey remember that time when

No,
nobody remembers that time, so I can reframe it any way I want. It’s
not like "no witnesses" was my policy; more like my default position. I
mean, here’s the thing: if you start re-inventing yourself at age 12
and manage to do it consistently every 5 years or so, by the time
you’re 40 it’s like nothing matters anymore because nobody remembers
anything. It’s like reverse vampires: you grow old and everybody else
is young and you have more and more memories and more wrinkles to match
and everybody around you is young and idealistic and you feel like you
except nobody knows the stories. Remember how you linked arms and sang
Gilligan’s Island to drown out stupidity. Hey remember that time when
they almost got off the island. Nobody remembers that anymore. Nobody
remembers that you once wrote letters, nobody remembers what postage
stamps look like, nobody remembers how you put your scent on the paper,
as a clue.

And nobody remembers who you were except every few years one of
them writes to apologize for not treating you better when they were
only treating you how you deserved, oh misery are you so sad tonight.
Nobody remembers but they remember bad, by which I don’t mean badly;
remember how it felt when you thought things mattered, oh those were
the days. My friend.

Remember when you liked people without wondering if you’d miss them when they died. Remember when you met people for a minute. Remember when
watching shit unfold was mysterious, when you couldn’t see where the
story was going before it started. Remember when you thought it would
go on forever.

taste of blood

I see someone I thought I knew (however vaguely — still: thought I knew) doing something so entirely counter to what I would do in those circumstances that though what I want is to know if I don’t understand the circumstances, though what I want is to know how that could be the decision, though what I want is ever and always to be informed, to understand, to know better, I am afraid that this difference in approach is a drastic difference in morals, and that knowing that would mean I never knew them, however vaguely. And so I bite my tongue and watch and wait and later maybe when nobody’s looking I’m not there anymore because I probably was never really there to begin with, since it wasn’t where I thought it was, anyway.

Saying Goodbye to Antony

It’s interesting how the focus has been on him for so long. How he came
to you, how he won you, how he was changed by you, how he felt when you left. Not
left: abandoned. I’m quoting. You kissed him awake and he listened to
you leave. And that’s all that gets talked about, and while that’s
certainly a good story, a classic, one for the poets, it’s not entirely
fair, is it.

Like take how they never talk about how he came to you; it’s like
he just was suddenly there. Like he arrived from nowhere. Like it’s not
possible that you wanted him to come to you, called him: none of it was
your idea. This ties in to the "conquering" idea which has always vexed
you; that and the "winning" — you are not some prize, dammit.

And it’s always like he arrived with nothing but his pain and his
past with which to barter. You had your own pain, a point nobody likes
to consider. The truth is: you both had things that you needed so badly
you’d decided you’d never get them. You both were well-covered in
tarnish to hide the imperfections: his dented pride, your gouged heart.
And because you both knew the truth about yourselves, it was easy to
see the truth about each other. They make like you healed him and you
like to think that’s true but you didn’t walk away empty-handed by a
long shot. Spit and cloth and ashes from letters you burned long ago,
and he handed your heart back to you; not repaired because it can’t be
fixed, but no longer something you had to close your fist around to
hide.

Or they talk about him hearing you go. One presumes
there were stairs to be descended. He listened to the music of your
footsteps as you left. Well: what was he supposed to do? He’s not
stupid after all, and sobbing after you is the one thing that would
have sent you off sooner. Without wishing to discount how hard it might
have been to stand there, clenching a jaw muscle or two, being stoic,
it is a lot harder to go downstairs knowing you’re doing the right
thing but also still having your eyes full of tears. And you couldn’t
look back because then he would have seen you cry; it cuts both ways
and it’s not like it was easy.

It’s hard to let go completely, and probably you never will: It feels
like letting go would mean denying it meant anything, and it did, it
did, it did. The goal is to be honest about it, not encapsulate it in a
caricature, and yet button it down somewhere so it doesn’t look at
you all the time with its what if? eyes. What if you had stayed? What
if staying had been what was meant to be, instead of leaving?

We talk about the past like we knew where it was headed just because
we know where it ended. We say something wasn’t meant to be, because
that’s how it isn’t, now. If you had stayed with him, he would not have
stayed in love with you. He was prepared for you to leave because
whatever he said, he wanted you to go. Anyway, that’s what you tell
yourself.

most beautiful when unbroken

I am (nearly) forty years old and I still rarely make eggs without
getting a teeny bit of shell in there somewhere. My friend says cooking,
for her, is like editing for me: a compulsion. And here I am leaving
grocer’s apostrophes of eggshell all over. Hopeless. This morning for
breakfast I had zucchini and eggs and potatoes; the crisp edges of
properly fried zucchini mask the eggshell, though I think miraculously
this morning I made an omelet without breaking any more egg than was
absolutely necessary. I was
singing while I stirred in the potato: "Any weird you can cook, I can
eat weirder, I can
eat any food weirder than you!" and I’m sure Ethyl Merman rolled over in her
grave, but maybe she was dancing along.

Yesterday, I think it was yesterday, I made rice. "A
scant cup. A scant cup. A cup that is scant. That cup’s scant. That cup
can’t." WHY. Some people talk all the time to prevent their brains from
starting that pesky business of thinking but it’s like I’m treading
water in my brain sometimes to stop myself from floating.

Since I don’t walk Squire to school anymore, I am no longer
terrorizing the neighborhood with my early morning outbursts, standing
in the middle of the sidewalk laughing because I remember something
outrageously funny or chatting myself up in my phony French accent. I’m
sure everybody’s much happier. Nobody needs to see my particular brand of crazy before eight a.m. On Mondays when I go to the high school,
the old ladies on the tram all love me ’cause I give them my seat when
the pig men don’t, and then they (the ladies) always want to talk to me,
with their gold teeth and purple tints and whack makeup. They know
they’ve spotted one of their own in the making. Last week one of them
was nodding at me the whole way home, in other words giving me much
more positive feedback than your average high school senior, and I
wanted to give her my cheery smile but frankly it was all too awful in
my head and I just couldn’t. When she got off the tram she patted my
hand and I realized I was crying. Oh, my old ladies, the mascara is
roping down my cheeks and I am closer than I think.

Last week was entirely too long. If the weekend hadn’t come when it
had, I think drastic action would have been taken. I have high hopes for
this week, though. Not least because the Teletubbie House of Pain video makes me
confident there must be some real good in the world.

subject line from "White Dwarfs", a perfect poem by Michael Ondaatje.

boom boom boom boom

The boomerang is one of the coolest toys ever. Part of the reason that
the boomerang is a cool toy is that it wasn’t originally a toy but a tool.  Not a
tool like that guy you dated in college but a real tool, I mean one
that was good for something. A boomerang went out and killed your
dinner, which I have just confirmed is true because I looked it up. The
European ones apparently weren’t meant to come back to you which is
sort of not all that surprising but that’s not what I’m talking about.

So boomerangs are cool, they’re sort of exotic and foreign but not
entirely unfamiliar. They go and out do things for you. They can bring home
the bacon and they also, apparently, play music if you know how to hold
them right. They’re not exactly doing those things FOR YOU because
they’re not servants, you know. They do what they do because it’s their
nature. You send them out and they do what they were made to do and I
guess you could say that basketballs were made to go through hoops but
if you don’t think a boomerang is cooler than a basketball then I don’t
even know why we’re talking. A boomerang is a kerjillion times cooler
than any ball that you bounce, throw, or pass, and it’s even cooler
than a weapon that’s just a weapon because a knife only wants to cut
stuff including your fingers if you aren’t careful but a boomerang can
hang out in the field with you on a lazy windless day going out and
back, like a hawk without jesses.

I want to use words like elegant and sleek but in a way these fall
flat. Of course you can get some cheap plastic thing but we are people
of taste and plastic offends us so let’s talk about real boomerangs,
old school. They are so beautiful to touch, to run your finger along
that edge and know that this curve here, where all you want to do is
touch it, run your finger along how smooth it is and this thing that
you can barely stand to stop touching is the very thing that will make
it come back to you. I mean, if you throw it right.

And of course boomerangs come back if you throw them right, if you’re
not a big disgrace to the Aborigine race. The boomerang wants to come
back to you. It wants to rest in your hand again, to feel that it’s
gone forth and done what it was meant to do and now your lovely long
fingers are running along that curve again and that was so good, that
freedom going forth and that arc of longing and that return home.

But maybe you are too afraid the boomerang won’t come back. Maybe
you’re not ready for boomerangs. Maybe you should start with yo-yos,
you know. Something with strings attached.

on what’s fair game in an unfair game

Today I am thinking about public vs. private personality. In
particular, I am thinking about the difference between having a
voluntary or involuntary public persona, especially as it relates to
politics. How much we expect the families of politicians to step up and
work for them, campaign for them, smile endlessly and never even
scratch their noses. I think it’s unfair. I think it’s wrong. It is the
way it’s done, though, and I wish we could agree on some rules. I wish
for rules to protect the innocent, and I also wish for rules that will
make it possible for me to mock the ridiculous.

Though it seems unfair to me, I’ll concede that in order to
win, it is now necessary to haul your family along for the ride. You
can’t be a drug addict and your spouse can’t be either; also ideally
your kids will be reasonably respectable. Somewhere along the line we
started thinking the choices you made as a family member were the
choices you would make as the leader of a country, and while I think
that’s not accurate I understand it’s part of the mythos and okay: You
wanna be president, your family will have to be at your side. And they
will be judged for their behavior at your side. If you don’t like that,
you don’t get to be the boss of the country.

So: You’re a family member of a politician. You’re going to
be judged. I don’t think it’s fair to judge anybody for their personal
appearance unless they’re trading on that appearance or have altered
that appearance. Plastic surgery is always fair game. The big nose you
inherited from your grandfather is not. Tattoos can be mocked. Acne
cannot. Bad makeup, bad perm, bad haircolor, ill-fitting clothes, and
the inability to walk in high heels for any person who is both old
enough to know better and financially capable of rectifying errors? I
have made those mistakes and so half the time I’m laughing with, but
make no mistake: I’m laughing. But it is not fair to mock without
sympathy the cluelessly young, honestly poor, or hopelessly
ill-advised, and it is never okay to assume that appearance (the one
you’re born with, at least) is any reflection of character.

But you can judge people for their behavior, for sure. Any
family member over the age of let’s say 16 should show up, unless they
have the flu or homework. They should look happy to be there. This is
not because they have to actually be happy but because if a family
member is in politics, I expect that member to have good enough manners
to handle a peace summit and I expect the rest of the family to be able
to muster the manners to smile through a a political convention. It is
not harder than telling Aunt Agatha you love that handmade sweater, and
if you don’t have the stamina for that, your family will not survive in
politics.

I
also think if they volunteer to go beyond standing at your side and
smiling and waving, if they, say, want to start their own blog in which
their description of themselves includes their astrological sign…
well, that’s like shooting Playmates in a barrel, isn’t it? And people
who fall asleep in church while trying to make their spouse look
attentive to an issue deserve at the very least to be openly laughed
at, even if they didn’t actually drool or anything.
I’ve yet to find anything funny in dog torture or glocks on a plane,
but I’m sure it will come to me. And it’s fair game, don’t you think?